She’s a lot less blue than I remember, but that’s her.

That’s Pierce Brosnan, famous for his role as Mister Doubtfire and the voice of Genie in Aladdin

deleted by creator

Don’t worry, the memes make themselves

Disassemble it, take the parts out and reassemble it. Be sure to blow bits of dust and hair off the platter before reassembly.

Take note of which community this is posted on.

What about Al Pacino machines?

Just Fucking Capitalise Every Word For No Reason.

Have you considered AI Pachinko machines?

You had one job…

Not to mention Bulma housebreaking a proud saiyan prince.

But Bulma is not on the top of the food chain in their extended family; Buu is.

Not even Bulma will risk pissing off the questioningly stable mentally challenged fatty.

Compile this fucking [expletive] [slur]!

good luck getting funding to study it.

Thanks for making half my point :p

The theory is probably that if someone is used to having sex with a child-like object, then it’s a smaller step to having sex with a child. Maybe that’s true. It seems plausible at least.

You make a great point, and one which has so much nuance than most people want to consider.

It’s similar to the discussion around lolicon/shotacon (hentai featuring girls/boys). Some people say that it acts as a pressure valve, and others say that it desensitises those which use it.

The nuanced point: to some it acts as a pressure valve, and to a smaller minority, it may desensitise and become a hazard for risk prone individuals.

This is basically true of any population; the subset of risk prone individuals is smaller than the one which rehabilitation efforts will facilitate.

Nobody wants to touch this topic with a ten foot pole, which makes it an inherently interesting topic for me.

These issues need to be discussed rationally and pragmatically by politicians to change laws in order to maximise child safety.

Unfortunately, a great deal of what seems to contribute to child safety is unintuitive and provokes a reactive disgust response.

There was a news article recently about an Australian importing a child-sized sex doll. This is illegal, but it really shouldn’t be.

The evidence seems to suggest adult-sized sex dolls reduce sexual violence, so why would a child-sized sex dolls be any different?

The sad fact is it is political suicide to suggest legalising child-sized sex dolls, even if it was statistically likely to reduce crimes against children.

Seems like a legitimate and unbiased source /s

A mental illness is by definition the suffering caused by a condition, not the cause or the symptom itself.

Pedophiles are not inherently ill, but they may be if they suffer from the frustrations they feel.

the threat of prison has never stopped prisoners.

Hardcore History has a great episode about public capital punishment throughout history, and how it has not deterred criminals at all.

Predators are opportunists, they don’t abuse children with an expectation to be caught. I don’t expect an opportunist to announce themselves as capable of deceit before committing a crime, so I don’t think permitting them to be honest with others is something they’d want to do.

Even with the most charitable perspective, people would still view virtuous pedophiles as live grenades.

Consider if someone said “I have a rape kink, I’d never act on it, so I’d still like to be invited to [insert event where people might stray from the group, or drink so much they pass out.]”

The only real answer is to remove the stigma around existing, so they can get professional help. Which is hard when “kill pedophiles” is seen as a socially acceptable reaction to news articles about child abuse (my point is that pedophiles aren’t inherently criminals).

Okay so… One species of cockroach DOES produce “milk” but its the Pacific beetle cockroach (Diploptera punctata)

They secrete the “milk” into the brood sack (uterus-like pouch housing embryos).

Thank you for refusing to answer the question.