If you don’t understand someone’s code, be brave and leave a comment saying you don’t understand. If you can’t understand it, the next person who has to maintain it won’t either. It’s a strong indication that refactoring should be done.
Also if something breaks, just remember that you can roll back.
Good luck!
No. He’s just a common guest. He has a substack where he talks about this stuff.
I think most people think about it more if the second way you described (as kind of a small retirement hobby, not to earn much money).
Tech workers spend all of their time working on abstract problems that have no end and spend all their energy to produce something intangible that must indefinitely be maintained.
They see farming as the exact opposite of this: something they can work on with their hands in the dirt, that eventually bears fruit that you can hold in the palm of your hand, and even eat yourself and personally benefit from.
This is much more an urge to return to nature and the feeling of actual accomplishment rather than an actual business plan. It doesn’t really matter how it goes financially because they already have enough money to retire.
My guess is their intention is to ban the Lion and Sun flag, and banning the pride flag is a happy coincidence for them.
Ardour is an open source DAW (like Cubase/Logic Pro/Reaper) which is meant for music writing. You can use that potentially instead of Audacity for recording and using MIDI instruments.
Apparently that’s something that Bill Gates is an expert in…
For coding, you could use VSCode, which is not the same as VS but it has enough extensions to probably support your use-case?
Also crazy because Trump was the one who made Powell the chair of the Fed.
Let’s be clear. The US military is extremely competent. This is a fact whether you agree with what they do or not, they are scary good at what they do.
Yes. This is true. We did not lose in Iraq or Afghanistan militarily. We lost because of poor statecrafting ability.
This How Money Works video talks about these hollow threats. In short, they probably would leave anyway.
I find the best way to start is to come up with the simplest project you can think of. Then when you get stuck, you can watch tutorials that help you figure that part out.
That way, you can actually put the tutorial teaching to use, and taking what they’re talking about and applying it to your small project will really help get it to stick.
That’s fair. Appeasement worked really well for Neville Chamberlain, so we should follow his lead and just give Trump this one thing. I’m sure, based on his track record, he won’t demand anything else.
Yes. It’s extremely helpful when I’m doing a refactor and can just go TAB TAB TAB TAB Oops not that TAB TAB done. Saves me a lot of time with the boilerplate, but is very bad at the logic portions.
Also verified
It doesn’t make sense that this would backfire, because Trump and his supporters are perfectly capable of holding conflicting viewpoints like this.
It’s totally reasonable to expect that this would be morally reprehensible when Democrats do it, but reasonable and a smart business move when a Republican does it.
This is a great point, and one I overlooked. Thanks for sharing!
Well if the crops are going bad, you don’t need to hire the truckers to move the produce, you don’t need to hire the grocers to sell the produce, and you don’t need to hire the chefs to cook the produce.
The article doesn’t address this though, rather:
Job openings decreased in health care and social assistance by 181,000, in arts and entertainment by 62,000, and in mining and logging by 13,000.
Which doesn’t say that it’s directly related. Health care and entertainment jobs reducing is probably more indicative of Americans spending less on discretionary spending either because of economic hardship or the expectation of economic hardship.
Mining and logging losses could be tariff related, or possibly in response to softening demand for primary inputs.
Today down 1.37%, but up 7.14% overall for the week.
I would say there is a bit of a difference. One thing can be worse than the other but still be bad.