

Yes, cold tube straight out of the fridge


Yes, cold tube straight out of the fridge


if you remove the paper
Usually they pop while peeling them. Even the ones that say to use a spoon after peeling. I did one tube the proper way and felt so confident going into the second tube which immediately exploded. Never trust the tube


You do definitely need some agent-specific guidance locally. The committed AGENTS.md should be pretty sparse. Ironically I think the clearest use case is for instructing agents that AI contributions are not allowed. Not that they won’t ignore it if prompted.


You’d put the things that aren’t up to personal preference in there, like an AI disclosure / contribution policy or what changes should look like to be reviewable. You usually don’t need to tell humans “don’t change things for the sake of changing them” because we don’t like to do more work than we have to, but agents do.
You can also include a compact “table of contents,” describing what lives where in the project. It saves at most a little bit of exploration though so I don’t know if it’s really worth the maintenance


No, we can’t. The biochemistry needs to be there. The fly brain is a discretized abstract model of the fly brain with none of the weights it would need to be an actual (discretized abstract) model.


You shouldn’t. It’s just a neural net shaped like a fly brain. There’s no biochemistry simulation past that.


Fly-brain-shaped neural net with some explicitly programmed behaviors. The actual biochemistry of the brain is not modeled.


Many species such as:


Not CPU limited, actually the opposite. It targets games where the CPU is frequently waiting for the GPU to catch up. It fixes a defect in the AMD pstate driver’s active (EPP guided) mode that would cause the CPU to be treated like it’s idle if it’s often taking short sleeps, even if it’s actually quite busy.
It doesn’t have any. Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic applies to integers greater than 1.
Hence why 1 is not considered prime
1, 11, 11*1, etc
Gotta add context for readers.
Of all the numbers to call boring you picked the Grothendieck prime.
2 is unambiguously prime. The best motivation for the definition of primality I know is the fundamental theorem of arithmetic: every integer greater than 1 can be uniquely decomposed into a product of primes. That’s what primes are, and the uniqueness constraint is why 1 is not prime.


That doesn’t follow. What I think you mean is that by defining the constraints so rigorously, you’ve basically solved the problem yourself. But that’s exactly the point. The LLM isn’t the problem solver, it’s the execution engine that does the wiring-up and the ticking of boxes. The easy part, arguably, sure. But still considerable effort that can be saved, and that effort may be better spent on the problem-solving + constraint-defining stage.
Mandatory disclaimer that this is not a pro-AI post. I also don’t agree that this setup works, anyway. It’s a classic Bob Martinism, the idea that writing good enough specifications makes the implementation irrelevant; it’s the type of idea that is allergic to reality


Any software born after 2025 should be assumed LLM nonsense until proven otherwise. The days of “there’s a working proof of concept so someone must actually have put some thought and effort into it” are gone.


The 3ms figure is nonsense anyway. 2ms of that is just bad scheduling/presentation config that disappeared when using dxvk-low-latency. Use native wayland or Gamescope+WSI and you’re within 1ms of X11 generally.
It’s dithered and possibly smoothed and upscaled, not necessarily AI


It would be trivial to add online only drm with a killswitch to physical media. If that’s the problem, discs aren’t the solution. What we actually need is legal protection for consumers.
Yes. In the video it is ordered as “breakfast tacos and cheese.” For breakfast.