

Driver isn’t liable if the engine explodes while he’s following the rules of the road. It will be important to hold those who built the models just as liable when they don’t follow lawful instructions.


Driver isn’t liable if the engine explodes while he’s following the rules of the road. It will be important to hold those who built the models just as liable when they don’t follow lawful instructions.


Dewey decimal


Forbidden firewood


Witchcraft! It chose Debian for me. I use and enjoy Debian.
“Small changes to a few sections.” There. Happy?
Stockholm syndrome.
“Specifically Annoying” or “Plausible Bullshit”? I’d buy the latter.


Finally, a 100% certain way of contacting alien life!


If you format them all, you make sure you got the one you wanted.


Agreed. My life is also not better for disliking things, but I really LIKE disliking those things.


“… I don’t like disliking it.” You and I have very different life experiences.


That’s all we needed back on the 90s. Three for the government to run their wargames, one for each major university to run their interwebs pump. one for each blue-chip company to make sure they were complying with trickle-down economics. The remaining were sold overseas to allied countries so they could bootstrap themselves out of the late Renaissance. What a heady time it was to be alive.


Note: This is Leopards Ate My Face. This is the place where people enjoy seeing comeuppances manifest.
Yep. Conspiracy or stupidity. Bold, egocentric stupidity.
The capitalist machine was also hooked on potash and lumber from Canada and labor from Mexico, but here we are.
Sure, and it counts double if code you wrote was the reason for the safety meeting.


For what it’s worth, I’ve got similar experience, and I’ve seen what OP is talking about. CEO rolling in twice a year to make arbitrary decisions that overrides Product. Product fighing amongst themselves as to what the CEO actually meant. Anyone questioning any of the above is let go for not being a team player.


Oh man, I totally forgot about alcohol and drugs! Thanks for the reminder. Gonna start the weekend early.
My point is: if the LLM was following the end user’s instructions, then the end user should be liable. If the LLM was going against the end user’s lawful instructions, then the company that built the model should be liable. At no point is the LLM itself liable because that is moon-man talk. This follows the same legal framework as automobiles, like you said.