I’m not claiming it’s a good idea to enable it, but it exists

Not with live patching

Where is jeans? This is denimless propaganda

Electricity costs money, thus, keyboard strokes and mouse clicks technically do have a monetary cost

I love this format

The definitions are always behind, and custom sources are still behind. The configuration sucks and that’s from a NixOS user. The IO latency is atrocious when set to watching the filesystem, and it’s generally unwieldy. The clamscan/clamdscan separation doesn’t make sense either. And it’s slow as hell parsing definitions.

ClamAV is shit, and I’ve been using it on my machine for years

And it turns out there’s a global crisis with beans.

Beans again? We will never escape the cycle of samsara.

This image just hit too many reward centres in my brain wtf

Ok, but hear me out. What if the universe is the insides of a quantum computation doing a Levin search based on reversible computation? Aka every time you truly hesitate before making a decision you’re doing a quick-save?

Edit: oh, and it’d be lazily evaluated in this case

We had to use these dammit.

Depends on whether they use floor or ceil. From observation, most systems round down.

This my moment. I have been waiting for this for so long.

Actually, a rating of 5 means all the reviews are 5 stars. Any other rating would drop it below 5.

I find it wondrous how oblivious you’re being to the fact that your words make you seem just as bad as the kind of extremism you’re describing.

Zeal needs no religion to breed extremist views, just the hubris of a self-righteous person who thinks they know enough to judge all. Then religion becomes a tool to justify whatever opinion they’re trying to impose and whatever acts they choose to commit. Violence included.

So I don’t think being a militant atheist gives you superpowers. Nearly been there, almost done that. Stopped and did a U turn at some point. Sought answers. Then found my peace and own dogma. I encourage you to try and do the same.

Scientific version of what I’m trying to say if you’re interested (contributions welcome if you’re a neuroscientist or have access to an LLM with access to journals).

Especially when it makes you shiver all the way up and down. 🐢

accidentally

Reading this comment with the assumption my wife will find it some day: Right, she doesn’t give out my number instead of hers as a contact point every time she visits a shop that asks, and certainly not because she has it memorised and it’s too much of a bother to give out her own, not at all.

All the WhatsApp group invitations for clothing and grocery places that happen after she goes shopping are completely unrelated.

Does that one come with fishnets? Perchance?

Why does their admission sound prideful? Does anyone reading into it detect a “look at what our unreleased models can do” subtext?

It’s the basic human tendency to take an unbiased ideology, broadcast an unintended interpretation to generate a following, then build a cult that puts them in power.

The oldest trick in the book. And it sadly works, nearly every time.